![]() ![]() This information may be available at the local county courthouse in the "Civil Index."Ĭalifornia Superior Court contact informationĪll information provided by the Medical Board of California on this Web page, and Some medical malpractice information, e.g., pending or dismissed cases.Misdemeanor convictions that occurred after Januand did not result inĪn accusation or disciplinary action being filed by the Board.Investigations conducted by the Medical Board of California.Complaints made to the Medical Board of California.Would NOT appear on a record if applicable to the physician: Under California law, the following information is confidential and NOT public and The Physician Profile Description provides you with a guide to understanding what is displayed on the profile. The Board's Frequently Asked Questions - Public Information/Disclosure provides additional information. Provides an overview on how you may request information from the Board and what method you must use to obtain this information. Records to be posted on the Board's website. Information is not available on a physician's profile on the website, pursuant to law, it may beĪvailable through the Board via telephone or upon a written request.Ĭalifornia law does not permit all of a physician's Physicians licensed by the State of California. What is and is not available from the Medical Board of California (Board) about In reviewing a physician's information, it is important to know Via a budget letter, DCA is requesting $16.7 million during fiscal year 2017-18 for continued maintenance and operation of the BreEZe system.Physician License Lookup - Public Disclosure The report would include DCA's plans for migrating the remaining 19 boards to a new system. Two weeks ago Assemblymember Jay Obernolte, R-Big Bear, introduced legislation ( AB 1190) that would require an annual report to the Legislature beginning in 2018. Jason Kaiser of the Physical Therapy Board of California noted that while BreEZe was expensive, it's an investment and he said the board understands that costs will continue year to year and that staff will continue to work regularly on change requests and improvements. She said when the project was initially discussed, she was "concerned because there was a significant amount of staff time being devoted to it, but it is beneficial to consumers, as well as to the licensees and staff." State Board of Optometry Vice President Donna Burke said her organization "is very, very satisfied with BreEZe. Officials said the project was more complex than anticipated and the boards and bureaus had individual business needs and workflows that made the centralized system difficult to develop.īut if Monday's hearing rings true, the boards and bureaus using BreEZe appear to be more bullish about their system. Troubles with BreEZe made headlines two years ago after the project's total cost jumped to roughly $96 million from an initial $28 million estimate. Hill added that the eventual cost needs to be considered. Jerry Hill said during a legislative hearing on Monday. "It seems now that some will be rolling out in BreEZe for their Release Three, and some will maybe will transition to some other platform," State Sen. Some lawmakers and DCA officials also have speculated that the remaining boards could potentially utilize or piggyback off of a software platform for licensing from Accela that DCA will stand up for the cannabis industry by 2018. While we anticipate some will end up on BreEZe, the process will ultimately determine the best solution," a DCA spokesperson emailed to Techwire this week. From this process, the appropriate technology will be determined to fit their business requirement needs. "For the remaining entities they will be going through the project approval lifecycle process as required by the California Department of Technology. That's still the case today, although there appears to be a few emerging possibilities. That left 19 without a long-term solution many are still using DCA's legacy system, known as the Applicant Tracking System. ![]() The Department of Consumer Affairs' (DCA) licensing and enforcement system, called BreEZe, has moved into the maintenance and operations phase - but that does not mean the work is done.Īfter the project was re-scoped in 2015, only 18 of 37 boards and bureaus under the department's purview migrated onto BreEZe due to schedule delays and cost overruns.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |